An Integrated Maritime Fusion Governance Model: An AHP-Based Escalation Framework for Maritime Security
Main Article Content
Abstract
Maritime security governance in archipelagic states such as Indonesia suffers from fragmented institutions, overlapping mandates, and the absence of structured escalation logic linking threat conditions to response levels. This study addresses these gaps by proposing and demonstrating the Integrated Maritime Fusion‑Governance Model (IMFGM), a decision framework that combines fusion centre operations, escalation protocols, and quantitative multi‑criteria analysis. Using a simulated Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) grounded in theoretical escalation theory and maritime operational doctrine, the model evaluates four Siaga alert states (Siaga 4 normal monitoring to Siaga 1 maximum readiness) across three primary criteria (strategic, operational, tactical) and six sub‑criteria (indicators, threat trends, Common Operational Picture, coordination, intercept control, target accuracy). The results reveal that tactical utility dominates (weight = 0.63), with intercept control accounting for nearly half of the global decision priority (0.473). Under baseline assumptions, Siaga 1 ranks highest (0.46), followed by Siaga 2 (0.31), Siaga 3 (0.15), and Siaga 4 (0.08). Sensitivity analysis confirms model adaptiveness: reducing tactical weight to 0.40 makes Siaga 2 optimal, while elevating strategic weight raises Siaga 3. The study extends Bueger’s maritime security assemblage framework by adding decision and escalation dimensions. Policy recommendations include establishing a national fusion centre with prioritised data hierarchies, formalising quantified escalation protocols, strengthening civil‑military coordination through joint standard operating procedures, enhancing C4ISR interoperability, and conducting empirical AHP surveys for model calibration. Limitations include the use of simulated rather than empirical expert judgments and the static nature of the AHP framework. The IMFGM provides a transparent, replicable architecture for maritime escalation governance pending real‑world validation.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Agorku, G., Hernandez, S., Hames, H., & Wagner, C. (2025). Enhancing Maritime Domain Awareness on Inland Waterways: A YOLO-Based Fusion of Satellite and AIS for Vessel Characterization. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2510.11449
Ardinal, A. (2025, November 11). Southeast Asia’s Maritime Gatekeepers: Why Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore Now Shape the Future of Global Trade. Indo Maritim. https://www.indomaritim.com/2025/11/11/southeast-asias-maritime- gatekeepers/
Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2024). Understanding Maritime Security. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197767146.001.0001
Bueger, C., Edmunds, T., & Stockbruegger, J. (2025). UNCLOS under Fire: Recalibrating Maritime Security Governance. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 74(S1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589325101218
Darmawan, A., & Prasetya, J. H. (2025, March 4). The new TNI Law: Will it undermine maritime security governance? Indonesia at Melbourne. Sistem Digital Keamanan Maritim Volume I, Issue 1 (2026) pp.10-29 28 https://indonesiaatmelbourne.unimelb.edu.au/the-new-tni-law-will-it- undermine-maritime-security-governance/
Đelović, D., Aleksić, M., Iker, O., & Chalaris, M. (2025). Berth Efficiency Under Risk Conditions in Seaports Through Integrated DEA and AHP Analysis. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(7), 1324. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071324
Deniozos, N., & Stamatopoulos, T. (2025). Optimizing Maritime Security Strategies: A Methodological Approach Using AHP and SWOT. EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL, XXVIII(Issue 3), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/4060
Dolonseda, N. (2022). The Strategic Role of the Defense Industry in Answering the Needs of KRI Capability C4ISR to Achieve Maritime Security in Indonesian National Jurisdictions. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship, 16, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.55208/fmspnp91
Fabinyi, M., Cvitanovic, C., Barclay, K., Bennett, N. J., Chan, E., Nguyen, H., Partelow, S., Song, A. Y., Stacey, N., Steenbergen, D., Suarez, B., & Tanyag, M. (2025). Rethinking maritime security from the bottom up: Four principles to broaden perspectives and centre humans and ecosystems. Npj Ocean Sustainability, 4(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-025-00130-9
Gangadharan, S. (2025, November 27). Indonesia’s Military Modernisation To Counter Grey-Zone Tactics At Sea. StratNews Global. https://stratnewsglobal.com/defence- and-security/indonesias-military-modernisation-to-counter-grey-zone-tactics- at-sea/
Haryono, V., Faisol, A., & Achsyan, T. D. (2025). Optimalisasi Maritime Domain Awareness oleh Tentara Nasional Indoensia Angkatan Laut dalam Deteksi Dini Ancaman Maritim. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(11), 12821–12828. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i11.9916
Hozairi, H., Buhari, B., Lumaksono, H., & Tukan, M. (2019). Selection of Marine Security Policy using Fuzzy-AHP TOPSIS Hybrid Approach. Knowledge Engineering and Data Science, 2(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.17977/um018v2i12019p19-30
Isjchwansyah, Y. R. (2025, March 27). Budget cuts threaten to sink the Indonesian Maritime Security Agency’s operations | East Asia Forum. https://eastasiaforum.org/2025/03/27/budget-cuts-threaten-to-sink-the- indonesian-maritime-security-agencys-operations/
Moore, R. (2025, June 30). U.S., Indonesian Navies Commence Exercise Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training Indone. United States Navy. https://www.navy.mil/Press- Office/News-Stories/display-news/Article/4229633/us-indonesian-navies- commence-exercise-cooperation-afloat-readiness-and-trainin/
Octavian, A. (2025). PROJECTING FUTURE CHALLENGES IN MARITIME SECURITY. Proceeding Jakarta Geopolitical Forum, 8(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.55960/jgf.v8i1.262
Orzechowski, P. (2025, October 21). The Shift in SOC Escalation: From Manual to AI- Powered. Torq. https://torq.io/blog/escalation-matrix/
Otto, L., & Menzel, A. (2024). Global challenges in maritime security: Sustainability and the sea. Springer Nature.
Podlesnik, L., Bernik, I., & Mihelič, A. (2025). Integrating CTI and threat modeling for cyber resilience: An AHP assessment. PLOS ONE, 20(11), e0335154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335154
Prayitno, M. E., & Yanuar, Y. (2020). Development Of Indonesia Submarine Force Structure Based On Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) And Interpretive Structural Sistem Digital Keamanan Maritim Volume I, Issue 1 (2026) pp.10-29 29 Modeling (ISM) To Control National Interest At Sea. International Journal of Marine Engineering Innovation and Research, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v5i3.7186
Riyadi, S., & Erliyani, D. (2025). Strengthening Indonesia’s Maritime Safety Governance: Insights From Ship Accident Trends and Regulatory Oversight. Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan Dan Perikanan, 15(2), 123–125.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process.
Sondakh, J. D. N., Ekowanti, M. L., Wahyuni, S., & Sulistiyanto. (2025). Strengthening Maritime Security Governance in Indonesia: A Policy Transformation of Bakamla Toward a Sea and Coast Guard Model. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 9(11), 9469–9475. https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v9i11.2112
Syailendra, E. A. (2026). Establishing Mari.me Authority. IDSS Paper. https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/idss/ip26027-establishing-maritime- authority-law-politics-and-indonesias-coastguard/
Top, Ç., & Bal Beşikçi, E. (2025). Optimising ship-marine pilot assignments using AHP and VIKOR: a case study in maritime safety. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 1–22.
Wardana, V. E. S., Salim, S., & Achnaf, M. (2025). Optimalisasi Pemilihan Unsur Operasi TNI Angkatan Laut dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Zona Abu-abu di Laut Natuna Utara Menggunakan Metode AHP-TOPSIS | JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan: 14101- 14107. 8(12), 7.
Windward. (2025, November 12). What Is C4ISR? Windward. https://windward.ai/glossary/what-is-c4isr/